|
ICA 2007 PRECONFERENCE WORKSHOPS
Participation in a workshop requires that the registration fee be paid in advance
PRECONFERENCE #1
Joint Preconference of the ICA Philosophy of Communication, Intercultural/Development Communication, and the Public Relations Divisions; and the Center for Global Communication Studies, Annenberg School of Communication, U of Pennsylvania.
Title: Methodologies of Comparative Media Research in a Global Sphere: Paradigms-Critique-Methods
Time: Wednesday, May 23 and Thursday, May 24, 2007, 8:15 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
Limit: 120 persons
Cost: Members: $130.00 USD
(Includes refreshments)
Media and communication studies are in the process of transformation. Global or international communication delivered through satellite and Internet redefine conventional concepts of media, of the mass audience, of gatekeeping and agenda setting, of power, and of communication itself. It is timely to address methodological issues in this increasingly worldwide research context.
This preconference will provide a broad platform for the discussion of new emerging paradigms, approaches and parameters relevant to today’s globalized research terrains.
Wednesday. May 23
8:15 – 9:00 a.m. Registration / Light Breakfast
9:00 - 9:15 a.m. Welcome
9:15 - 9:30 a.m. Opening Remarks
Media Research in a Globalized Sphere: Parameters and Visions
Ingrid Volkmer, U of Melbourne, Australia
9:30 – 10:15 a.m. Keynote
Can Media Research Cope with Glocalization? Reflections on Global Challenges and Local Applications
Cees Hamelink, U of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
10:15 – 10:45 a.m. Coffee Break
Mapping the Globalized Space
10:45 – 11:15 a.m. Marwan Kraidy, American U, Washington, DC
What in the World is Global Media Studies ?
11:15 – 11:45 a.m. Joe Straubhaar, U of Texas, Austin
Multiple Television Flows for Multilayered Cultural Identities ?
11.45a.m. – 12:15p.m. Patricia Aufderheide / Katja Wittke, American U, Washington, DC
Mapping Global Publics in Open Media: Claims and Connections Online
12:15 – 1:15 p.m. Lunch
Comparing Media Flows; Experiences and Practices
1:15 – 1:45 p.m. Akiba Cohen, Tel Aviv U / Ven-Hwei Lo, National Chengchi U, Teipei, Taiwan
Comparative Research on Television Foreign News
1:45 – 2:15 p.m. Frank Esser, U of Zuerich / Barbara Pfetsch, U of Hohenheim/HarvardU
Conceptual Challenges to the Paradigms of Comparative Political Communication in a Globalized World
2:15 – 2:45 p.m. Lothar Mikos / Claudia Toepper, U of Film and Television, Potsdam, Germany
Challenges of Comparative Media Research – Report of Two Empirical Studies
2:45 – 3:00 p.m. Coffee Break
3:00 – 4:30 p.m. Methodologies of Comparison in Different Contexts
|
Panel 1: Journalism and Political Communication |
Panel 2: ‘Difference’ in Comparative Research |
Panel 3: Comparative Research and New Media Cultures |
Panel 4: Popular Culture and Identity |
Panel 5: Methods of Comparison |
|
Richard Stanton,
U of Sydney, Australia
Methodologies of Comparative Research in a Global Sphere: Global Media in National and Local Contexts |
Christina Slade, Macquarie U, Australia
Researching Citizenship and Global Media |
Gaijala Radhika, Bowling State Green U, USA
Researching Global/Local Digitally Mediated Networks: Producing Identity as Interface |
Denise D. Bielby, U of California, Santa Barbara, USA
Considering the Culture World of Global Media |
Vivan B. Martin, Central Connecticut State U, USA/Astrid Gynnild, U of Bergen, Norway
Bridging Media Industries and the Academy Using Classic Grounded Theory Methodology |
|
Christiane Page,
Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse U, USA
Doing Good or Doing Well: What Public Relations and Communication Can Tell Us About the Contribution of Transnational NGO’s to Global Governance |
Justin Martin, U of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA
Cross-National Media Research in the Middle East |
Fernando Bermejo, U Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain
Desparately Seeking the Online Audience. Quantitative Audience Research in a New Media Environment |
Ian Glenn, U of Cape Town, South Africa
Media, Democracy and White Identity in the New South Africa
|
Steffen Kolb, Hamburg Media School, Germany
Iterative Approach to Theory-Driven Comparative Research |
|
Dan Eisenberg / John Pollock, The College of New Jersey, USA
Comparing Cross-National Newspaper Coverage of NGO Efforts to Fight HIV/AIDS |
Andrea Hickerson, U of Washington, USA
Life Stories and Mediated Longing: The Role of Authenticity in the Diasporic Audience |
Saskia Witteborn, Chinese U of Hong Kong
Cultural Setting in Media Research: Studying Social Groups Online and Offline |
Ole J Mjos, U of Westminster, UK
Researching a Global Media Phenomenon: Reflections on Theory and Methods |
Eronini R, Megwa, California State U, Bakersfield, USA
Hybridization and Triangulation as Development Strategies: An Integrative Framework for Data Collection in a Dualistic Context |
|
Pauwke Berkers / Susanne Jannssen / Marc Verboord, Erasmus U, the Netherlands
Multiculturalism in Western Newspaper Coverage of Literacy Authors |
Dina Matar, School of Oriental and African Studies, U of London, UK
Researching Media Politics and Culture in the Arab World: Problems and Ways Forward |
|
Bingchun Meng, Annenberg School for Communication, U of Pennsylvania, USA
Who Needs Democracy if We Can Pick Our Favourite Girl? ‘Supergirl,’ Media Politics, and the Chinese Society |
Christopher Karadjov, California State U, Long Beach, USA
Sampling Bulgarian Journalists: Methods and Problems |
4.30 – 4.45 Coffee Break
4.45 – 6.15 Panels continue
|
Joseph Chan, The Chinese U, Hong Kong/Changjiang Chair, Fudan U, China
Comparing Journalists: Reflections on Two Issues in the Study of News People Across Societies |
Churu Uppal, U of South Pacific, Fiji
Diaspora and Dialectic: Maintaining Identity Beyond the Nation-State |
Debashis Aikat, U of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA
Communications with Developing Societies: The Role of Internet Communication in India |
Mary Mali He, The Chinese U of Hong Kong
A Collaborative Success in Chinese Film Industry: A Case Study of Crazy Stone |
Michael J, Palenchar, U of Tennessee, USA
Global Issues Start at Community Levels: Using Ethnography as a Means for Observing and Understanding Socially Constructed Risk Roles and Risk Perceptions |
|
Jimbong Choi, Bemidji State U, USA
Newspaper Coverage of Natural Disasters and the Us/Them Distinction |
Eda Derhemi, , U of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, USA
Identity Construction Through Multilingual Discourse in a Minority Newspaper: the Case of Arbresh |
Abdullah H, Mohammed, U of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania / Robin Boyd, West Virginia State U, USA
Vimkandalas: A Pentadic Analysis of the “video hut” experience in Tanzania, East Africa |
Radhika Parameswaran, , Indiana U, Bloomington, USA
Visions, Nations, and the Gaze of Global India: Challenges of Studying Media and Public Memory |
Katja Schwer, Ludwigs-Maximilian U, Munich, Germany
Guiding Principles of Media Governance: Towards a Methodological Tool for the Analysis of Media Policy Paradigms and Regulatory Structures |
|
Ansgard Heinrich, U of Otago, New Zealand
Networking and the Process of ‘Making the News’: The Paradigm Shift in the Global Journalism Space |
Xin Xin, U of Westminster, UK
From Propaganda Machine to Global News Agency? Xinhua News Agency 1980-2005 |
Angieszka, Stepinska,
Adam Mickiewicz U, Poland
Media and Politics: New Phenomena, New Relations |
Susanne Janssen, / Alex van Venrooij, Marc Verboord, U of Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Cultural Classifications in Comparative Perspective: The Case of Popular Music in France, Germany, The Netherlands, and the United States, 1955-2005 |
Vanessea De Macedo Higgins, / Amy Schmitz-Weiss, U of Texas, Austin, USA
Online Focus Group as a Method for Comparative Communication Research Across Borders |
|
Maha Bashri, Bradley U, USA
The Opinion and the Other Opinion: A Case Study of Al Jazeera’s Agenda Setting Effect in the Arab/Islam World |
Yuan Zhang, U of Gainesville, USA
Good for Me or For Us All? A Comparative Content Analysis of Manifest Individualism and Collectivism in Global and Local TV Advertising in China |
|
|
|
6:30 p.m. Reception
Sponsored by the Center for Global Communication Studies, Annenberg School for Communication, U of Pennsylvania
Thursday, May 24
9:00 – 10:30 a.m. Research Funding in a Globalized Context:
invited speakers:
Stefaan Verhulst, Chief of Research, Markle Foundation, New York, USA
Joe Karaganis, Program Director, Social Science Research Council, New York, USA
Becky Lentz, Ford Foundation, New York, USA
Consequences for Comparative Research
10:45 – 11:15 a.m. Donnalyn Pompper, Florida State U / Edward Lee, Leeds Business School, UK
Researcher-Researched ‘Difference’: In Search for Validity in the Global Sphere
11:15 – 11:45 p.m. Thomas Hanitzsch, / Thorsten Quandt, Ludwigs-Maximilian , U, Munich
Comparative Worlds of Journalism: Methodological Case Studies
l1:45 a.m. – 12:15 p.m. Andreas. Hepp, U of Bremen, Germany
Transcultural Media Research: Perspectives for Comparative Media and Cultural Studies in Times of Globalization
12:15 – 12:45 p.m. Susan Holmberg, Mid-Sweden U, Sundsvall, Sweden
Experiences, Lessons from a Pan-European Media Content Study
1:00 – 2:00 p.m. Lunch
2:00 – 3:30 p.m. Media Industry and Comparative Media Research:
(panel with media industry representatives)
3:30 – 4:30 p.m. Conclusion:
Oliver Boyd-Barrett, Intercultural Communication
Betteke van Ruler, Public Relations
Monroe Price, Center for Global Communication Studies, Annenberg School for Communication, U of Pennsylvania, USA
Ingrid Volkmer, Philosophy of Communication
PRECONFERENCE #2
***NOTE: This preconference workshop is NOT in the Hilton Hotel ***
The preconference is a joint effort by the Graduate School of Education, U of Californis, Berkeley, the international research project ‘Mediatized Stories: Mediation Perspectives on Digital Storytelling Among Youth’ www.intermedia.uio.no/mediatized/ based at the U of Oslo, the ARC Centre of Excellence for Creative Industries & Innovation, Queensland U of Technology, Australia www.cci.edu.au, and the Popular Communication and Communication and Technology Divisions
Title: Digital Storytelling: Critical Accounts of a Californian Export
Time: Thursday, May 24, 2007, 9:00 am - 3:00 pm U of California, Berkeley campus, Tolman Hall
Limit: 35 persons
Cost: Members: $30.00 USD (includes refreshments and lunch).
Student members of the Popular Communication division wishing to take part in the preconference could apply by a letter to the division chair, Professor Lynn Schofield Clark (Lynn.Clark@du.edu) by February 15, for need-based travel grants of $300. Indicate need and any other sources of support for the conference attendance, and attach a CV.
Transport: Guided transport to the site at U of California, Berkeley departs from the ICA Hilton conference hotel in San Francisco at 9:00 am on May 24th. Transport will be by the metro (BART). The venue at U of California, Berkeley, Tolman Hall (room 2515), is close to the Berkeley BART station on the line from downtown San Francisco. The participants pay their own BART tickets ($6.50 USD roundtrip).
Digital Storytelling is evolving as a participatory media practice around the globe. Individuals in a variety of institutional settings tell short, self-representational stories with standard digital equipment. These personal narratives are usually made with self-sourced images and told with the own voice.
Although there are many forms of digital storytelling, this pre-conference takes as its point of departure the approach that was developed at the Center for Digital Storytelling in Berkeley from the early 1990s (www.storycenter.org).
Their ideas of Digital Storytelling have spread throughout the world. Why has this Californian export become so popular? Which further-developing forms of digital storytelling should be observed? What are the broader meanings, the textual characteristics, its democratic and participatory potential, and future developments of digital storytelling? How could digital storytelling be understood as mediation practices and to which extent could it contribute to media literacy? Such questions deserve critical and constructive scholarly interest.
The preconference will trace the roots and the take-up of the Digital Storytelling movement, and raise research questions from three different corners of the world: from the ICA host state of California, from Europe and from Australia.
Schedule: 10:10–10:25 a.m. Introduction by Knut Lundby, U of Oslo, and Glynda Hull, U of California, Berkeley.
The Spread of Digital Storytelling: 10:25–11:00 a.m. ‘The Story of Digital Storytelling’. Joe Lambert, Center for Digital Storytelling, U of California, Berkeley, US.
11:00–11:10 a.m. Coffee
11:10–11:35 a.m. ‘A Critical Account of Digital Storytelling as it Appeared in Britain’. Nancy Thumim, London School of Economics & Political Science, UK. 11:35 a.m.–12:00 p.m. ’Digital Storytelling in Australia and Beyond’. Kelly McWilliam, Queensland U of Technology, Australia.
12:00–1:00 p.m. Lunch
Reflections on Digital Storytelling: 1:00–1:25 p.m. ‘Taking, and Mistaking, the Show on the Road: Multimedia Self-Presentation and Social Transaction’. Glynda Hull and Mark Nelson, U of California, Berkeley, US. 1:25–1:50 p.m. ‘Mediatized Stories: Autobiography and Authenticity in Digital Storytelling’. Birgit Hertzberg Kaare and Knut Lundby, U of Oslo, Norway. 1:50–2:15 p.m. ‘The Problems of Expertise and Scalability in Self-Made Media: Lessons from Digital Storytelling in Australia’. John Hartley, Queensland U of Technology, Australia
. 2:15–2:25 p.m. Coffee
2:25–3:00 p.m. Future directions – Concluding discussion: Kirsten Drotner, U of Southern Denmark, Jo Tacchi, Queensland U of Technology, Australia, and Larry Friedlander, Stanford U, US
Chair: Nick Couldry, Goldsmiths College, U of London. UK
PRECONFERENCE #3
Title: Making Communication Studies Matter: Field Relevance/Irrelevance to Media, Library, Electronic, Communication System, Designs, Policies, Practices
Time: Thursday, May 24, 2007, 8:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m.
Limit: 75 persons
Cost: $75.00 USD (includes snacks)
This working symposium draws on the results of a four-stage dialogic surround of the challenges of interdisciplinarity and interspectivity in user/audience studies and their applications to system and communication design. policy, and practice. In stage 1, a set of in-depth interviews were conducted with 114 international experts in three fields -- communication and media studies, library and information science, and human computer interaction/information technology -- focusing on gaps between fields in their understandings of (and modes of studying) users and audiences. The work at this stage was funded in part by a grant from the Institute of Museum and Library Services. In stage 2, some 15 of the experts (sometimes working with graduate student teams and supplemented with additional colleagues) wrote 45 impressionistic essays resulting from their readings of the interview set. In stage 3, an initial grounded theory thematic analyses of the interviews was completed. In stage 4, a panel discussion at the American Society for Information Science and Technology conference in November 2006 brought together six teams, 2 each from each of the three fields, to focus on "Being user oriented: Convergences, divergences, and the potential for systematic dialogue between disciplines and between researchers, designers, and providers." URL for this panel is at: http://imlsosuoclcproject.jcomm.ohio-state.edu/imls_papers/asist06panel_list.html.
This working symposium for ICA will constitute stage 5 of the dialogue with special emphasis on the communication field and its subfields. The presentations in the morning will come from an eclectic set of speakers representing the different fields as well as approaches and perspectives too often considered incommensurate. The speakers will focus on their "readings" of the results from stages 1 through 4 of the dialogue, combined with their understandings based on their own specialties of the challenges of interperspectivity and interdisciplinarity, to address these focal questions:
* Beyond surface stereotypes, what differences stand between fields and perspectives in how they see and study users and audiences, and how they conceptualize and execute the challenges of the design and practice of systems to meet human needs?
* Beyond impractical idealisms, what procedural and structural interventions might improve our capacities to communicate and make a difference across disciplines and perspectives?
In the afternoon, all enrollees and presenters will break into small groups. Each small group will begin with background presentations by the group facilitators focusing on a variety of theory-research informed attempts to build dialogic bridges in different contexts. The remainder of the small group time will be spent discussing the two focal questions set forth above. Each group will report back to the symposium as a whole at the end of the day.
A potential goal from the working symposium will be to advance the dialogue into a stage 6 -- to organize an international working group to propose and seek funding for an international symposium. The purpose of the workshop is not to arrive at "right" ways to do user/audience research but rather more effective ways of building bridges between the many different efforts being made to understand users/audiences and apply results of the work to communication and system design.
The Challenges of Being Dialogic Brenda Dervin, Ohio State U, USA Overview of the Three-Field Dialogue CarrieLynn Reinhard, Ohio State U, USA Disciplined Dialogue and its Implications for the Evaluative Explorations of Information Quality Issues Roberta Brody, CUNY - Queens College, USA Bringing Contemplative Attention to the Dialogue Between Teacher/Adviser and Student Kathleen Clark, U of Akron Systematically Nnurturing Creativity in Innovative Projects Angela Coco, U Of Queensland, Australia Using Sense-Making Self-Interviews to Facilitate Student Explorations into How They Construct Social Theories David Easter, Ohio State U – Lima, USA Helping Communication Practitioners to Bridge the Dialogic Gap Between Institutions and Their Publics Lois Foreman-Wernet, Capital U, USA Bridging Ourselves: Self-Reflexivity and Digital Storytelling in the Media Classroom John Higgins, Menlo College, USA Using Dialogic Interviewing to Understand Youth Radio Producers' Personal, Social, and Political Transformations Robert Huesca, Trinity U, USA Cyberproject Case Study of Training Effects on Team Communication of Ecologists and Computer Scientists Samantha Katz, U of New Mexico, USA Mediating Diversity and Uniformity: Using Web Pages to Evolve Systematic Content Analysis Methods HongChun Lee, Keio U; Youichi Ito, Keio U - Shonan Fujisawa, Japan Using Sense-Making as Dialogic Approach to Elicit and Transfer "Deep Smarts" for Leadership Transitions Albert Linderman, The Sagis Group, Inc., Arden Hills, MN email linde017@tc.umn.edu Communicating the Importance of Communication Research Through Real-World Practice and Research Projects Tingting Lu, Ohio State U, Japan The Role of Dialogue in Organizational Communication Paul Nelissen, Radboud U Nijmegen, The Netherlands Communication-Peace Bridge Christlin Rajendram, Eastern U - Sri Lanka Experiences with a Sense-Making Interdisciplinary Dialogue Among Researchers and Practitioners Studying Users/Audiences CarrieLynn Reinhard, Ohio State U, USA Using Sense-Making in Online Discussions to Facilitate Southeast Asian Student Readings of Indian Cinema David Schaefer, Franciscan U – Steubenville, USA Building Dialogic Bridges Across Theories/Disciplines: Teaching Core Social Theory to Undergraduates in Seven Departments Peter Shields, Eastern Washington U, USA Identifying Gaps, Building Bridges: Communicating Dance Between Dean and Faculty in a Collective Bargaining Environment Vickie Shields, Eastern Washington U, USA Using Knowledge Workers Sense-Making of Situationality as Tool for Adapting to What Matters Patricia Souto, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire, UK P.C.Nascimento-Souto@lboro.ac.uk Use of Sense-Making Interviewing for Capturing Software Requirements Georg Strom, U of Copenhagen, Denmark
Sandra Braman U of Wisconsin – Milwaukee, USA Participant Donald Case U of Kentucky, USA Participant Cees Hamelink U of Amsterdam, The Netherlands Participant Youichi Ito Keio U - Shonan Fujisawa, Japan Participant Robert Jacobson Bluefire Consulting - Santa Monica, CA, USA Participant Ed McLuskie Boise State U, USA Participant Michel Menou Somos@Telecentros, UK Participant John Nerone U of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign, USA Participant Hannu Nieminen, U of Helsinki, Finland Participant Marshall Poole Texas A&M U, USA Participant John Richardson University of California - Los Angeles, USA Participant David Snowden Cognitive Edge - Cardiff, Wales Participant Angharad Valdivia U of Illinois, USA Participant
PRECONFERENCE #4
The preconference is a joint effort by the U of Michigan Department of Communication Studies, Temple U, Microsoft Research, and Telenor Research.
Title: Mobile Communication: Bringing Us Together or Tearing Us Apart?
Time: Wednesday, May 23, 2007, 1:30 p.m. to 6:45 p.m.
Thursday, May 24, 2007, 8:00 a. m. – 5:00 p.m.
Limit: 50 Persons
Cost: Members: $40.00 USD
Student members: $20.00 USD
(Includes refreshments, lunch and reception)
There has been much attention paid to the state of social cohesion during the past decade. Robert Putnam has helped us to focus on social capital and its status. Analysis in Europe and in Asia has looked into the interaction between ICTs (usually the Internet) and the state of socialization, and now McPherson has delivered an analysis on social isolation in the US. While it is possible to comment on the studies, the general message seems to be that we are growing apart rather than closer together.
Or are we?
It is interesting to note that several studies focusing on mobile communication point at a different phenomena. Taking the clue from Licoppe’s “connected presence” and Katz & Aakhus’ perpetual contact, there is the sense that the threshold for interaction in the group – or the clique or the gang or the family – has never been lower. Among others, recent studies by Ishii and by Miyata in Japan, Lee in Korea, Reid and Reid in the UK, Banjo et al in the US and Ling et al in the broader European scene indicate that the groups who use mobile communication may indeed be more cohesive.
So what is it? Is it more, or less cohesion? Is the general trend towards individualization while the peer group is becoming more tightly intertwined? This is the theme that we wish to examine. While a portion of the program has been arranged in advance, we are also seeking proposals from both qualitative and quantitative research projects that examine this question. Proposal abstracts are due by |